Prix Edmond Malinvaud
Ce prix est remis par le Président de l'AFSE lors du Congrès.
Il n'y a pas d'appel à candidature pour ce prix.
Le jury de ce prix est composé de membres nommés par le Comité Directeur de l'AFSE sur proposition du Président de l'association.
2024
The jury of the Malinvaud Prize 2024 is pleased to award Suanna Oh (Paris School of Economics) for her paper entitled Does Identity Affect Labor Supply? published in 2023 in the American Economic Review, Vol. 113, Issue 8, pp. 2055-2083
The jury of the Malinvaud Prize 2024 was composed by Ghazala Azmat (Sciences Po), Pierre Boyer (Ecole Polytechnique), Anne-Célia Disdier (PSE), Céline Poilly (AMSE) and Fabien Tripier (Univ. Paris Dauphine) and was chaired by Laurent Ferrara (Skema Business School and AFSE Board Member).
2023
The jury of the Malinvaud Prize 2023 is pleased to award Michele Fioretti (Sciences Po) for his paper entitled Caring or Pretending to Care? Social Impact, Firms’ Objectives, and Welfare published in 2022 in the Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 130, Issue 11, pp. 2898-2942
The jury of the Malinvaud Prize 2023 was composed by Ghazala Azmat (Sciences Po), Pierre Boyer (Ecole Polytechnique), Isabelle Méjean (Sciences Po), Céline Poilly (AMSE) and Fabien Tripier (Univ. Paris Dauphine), and was chaired by Laurent Ferrara (Skema Business School).
2022
Le jury 2022 a décidé d'attribuer le Prix Malinvaud à Mathias Reynaert (Toulouse School of Economics) pour son article Abatement Strategies and the Cost of Environmental Regulation: Emission Standards on the European Car Market publié dans Review of Economic Studies, 2021, n°88 doi:10.1093/restud/rdaa058.
Flora Bellone, Université Côte d'Azur (Présidente)
Isabelle Méjean, Sciences Po Paris
Fabien Tripier, Université Paris Dauphine
Rémy Lecat, Banque de France
Lionel Ragot, Université Paris Nanterre
Elise Huillery, Université Paris Dauphine
2021
Le jury 2021 a décidé d'attribuer le Prix Malinvaud à Johannes Boehm (Sciences Po Paris) pour son article "Misallocation in the Market for inputs: Enforcement and the organisation of production" publié dans le Quarterly Journal of Economics (2020), co-écrit avec Ezra Oberfield.
Flora Bellone, Université Côte d’Azur (Présidente)
Yann Bramoullé, Aix Marseille Université
Elise Huillery, Université Paris Dauphine
Isabelle Méjean, Ecole Polytechnique
Régis Renault, CY Cergy Paris Université
Fabien Tripier, Université Paris-Saclay-Université Evry
2020
Le jury 2020 a décidé d'attribuer le Prix Malinvaud à Clémence Tricaud (Ecole Polytechnique-CREST) pour son article "Expressive Voting and Its Cost: Evidence From Runoffs With Two or Three Candidates" publié dans Econometrica (2018), co-écrit avec Vincent Pons.
2019
Le jury 2019 a décidé d'attribuer le Prix Malinvaud à Xavier d'Haultfoeuille (ENSAE-CREST) pour son article "Fuzzy Differences-in-Differences" publié dans la Review of Economic Studies (2018), co-écrit avec Clément de Chaisemartin.
2018
Le prix Edmond Malinvaud 2018 a été décerné à Dylan Glover (Sciences Po Paris) pour son papier "Discrimination as a self-fulfilling prophecy: evidence from French grocery stores" publié dans the Quarterly Journal of Economics en 2017, co-écrit avec William Parienté (Economics School of Louvain) et Amanda Pallais (Harvard University).
2017
2016
2015
Abstract:
Which and how many attributes are relevant for the sorting of agents in a matching market? This paper addresses these questions by constructing indices of mutual attractiveness that aggregate information about agents' attributes. The first k indices for agents on each side of the market provide the best approximation of the matching surplus by a k-dimensional model. The methodology is applied on a unique Dutch household survey containing information about education, height, BMI, health, attitude towards risk and personality traits of spouses. Three important empirical conclusions are drawn. First, sorting in the marriage market is not unidimensional: individuals face important trade-offs between the attributes of their spouses which are not amenable to a single-dimensional index. Second, although education explains a quarter of a couple's observable surplus, personality traits explain another 20%. Third, different personality traits matter differently for men and for women.
2014
2013
2012
Voir la remise du Prix